https://interfas.univ-tlse2.fr/slavicaoccitania/1036 Publications de Auteurs Lioudmila Gogotishvili fr 0 https://interfas.univ-tlse2.fr/slavicaoccitania/1395 L’hypothèse qui est à la base de cet article est la suivante : c’est par réaction à la crise aiguë de la conscience linguistique (qui n’a pas encore été jusqu’à nos jours clairement explicitée), suscitée par le manque de confiance dans les fonctions premières de la langue et, en particulier, dans son aptitude à exprimer adéquatement une chose, que sont apparues, dans la philosophie russe, diverses conceptions, différentes selon leur principe de composition, mais néanmoins typologiquement semblables par le fait qu’elles furent toutes des tentatives de dépasser la crise par le recours aux seules forces de la langue. Sur le fond d’un rappel rapide des particularités des théories linguistiques de Bakhtine, Florenski, Chpet et d’autres, nous insisterons ici sur la caractéristique de la théorie de la « polytropie positionnelle », telle qu’elle a été élaborée par A.F. Losev en tant que principe de production de textes, capable, selon lui, de garantir l’adéquation et l’intégralité de l’expression. The purpose of the article is to suggest a hypothesis as follows: An acute (and unexhausted till now) crisis of the linguistic consciousness, that incurred distrust in direct intentions of language and in its ability to express the sense adequately, had triggered a reaction in the form of emergence in Russian philosophy of some conceptions, different in the concrete principles of text generation, but united in the strategy aimed to resolve crisis by efforts of the language itself. Against the background of brief recording of the linguistic theories by Bahtin, Florenskiy, Shpet etc, with all their peculiarities, I am trying to give in this article the detailed characteristics of the theory of «positional polytropy» – elaborated by A. Losev in his linguistic doctrine – as a backbone principle of text generation capable, in its intention, to provide the adequacy and the entirety of expression. В статье обосновывается гипотеза, что в качестве реакции на острый (не исчерпанный по сей день) кризис языкового сознания, вызвавший недоверие к прямым интенциям языка и к его способности адекватного выражения, в русской философии сложился ряд различных (по конкретному принципу текстопорождения), но вместе с тем типологически единых (по стратегии преодоления кризиса силами самого языка) концепций. На фоне краткой фиксации особенностей языковых теорий Бахтина, Флоренского, Шпета и др., дается развернутая характеристика разработанной А. Лосевым теории «позиционной политропии» как стержневого принципа текстопорождения, способного, по замыслу, обеспечить адекватность и целостность высказывания. mar., 26 févr. 2019 12:41:02 +0100 ven., 09 juin 2023 08:48:01 +0200 https://interfas.univ-tlse2.fr/slavicaoccitania/1395 https://interfas.univ-tlse2.fr/slavicaoccitania/1035 G. Shpet and M. Bakhtin: Expected Divergences and Unexpected Approximations Even though the linguistic theories by Shpet and Bakhtin proceed from the diametrically opposite assumptions, they are, nevertheless, conceptually approaching each other in series of the intellectual and logical moments and constructions. The thesis expounded in the paper is that one of significant reasons for this approximation is the rarely mentioned circumstance, namely, that beyond the evident contradictions between Shpet and Bakhtin there is an underlying non sequitur likeness, and this likeness is determined by unity of their mutual dominant target – to find a way out of linguistical subjectivity. The direct contrarity of theirs conceptions is rooted in the different understanding of the very nature of the correlation between language and meaning. As is generally known, Shpet tended to bring them together as much as possible, still avoiding the full merging, hoping that this very nearness would open the real perspective of getting rid of, as he said, a solitary confinement of subjectivism. Whereas Bakhtin, on the contrary, insisted that the distance between meaning and language, still avoiding the complete separation, is unavoidable and blessed, and he pinned his faith upon polyphony – the special creative form that makes use just of this distance – as the only way to overcome solipsism. mer., 16 janv. 2019 10:33:31 +0100 mar., 16 mai 2023 13:56:54 +0200 https://interfas.univ-tlse2.fr/slavicaoccitania/1035